Avoiding Heathrow
The first time I went to London Heathrow was in 1994 and at that time, I thought that this was one of the world’s best airports (and it probably was). That was a transit trip and I had a four hour layover. There was enough to keep a novice traveler occupied for that duration and while I remember it as being definitely crowded, it wasn’t overwhelming. Subsequent trips in 2000 and 2003 were to the U.K. and I still found the airport good (but not great like Incheon or Changi). A few months ago, I had the misfortune of going through Heathrow again (transit) on a trip to Europe. I realized to my dismay that Europe’s busiest airport had descended into the dirty, chaotic mess that fits a developing or under developed nation rather than “Great” Britain.
The airport, which is now owned by a Spanish firm, handles close to 67 million passengers yearly even though it’s designed to handle only 45 million [source: The Economist]. The security lines snake for hundreds of yards and even if you have gone through excruciating security (”Spread ‘em Mr. Tafkap“) in other airports and you are just transiting, you still have to go through another humiliating check here. This means that any liquid you purchased in JFK (after clearing the security there) has to be thrown out before going through Heathrow security. People were clearly frustrated with this and I saw piles of discarded beverage containers next to the security line. The passengers were cursing in various exotic languages. The cost of buying anything after going through security is just preposterous here. A black coffee cost me around US $5 if I remember correctly. I didn’t even bother checking the prices on the Single Malts at the Whisky store. The toilets were crowded, stinky, and not well maintained (trails of toilet paper was all over the floor in the toilet close to the security check area).
(Read more…)


![[Print This Post] [Print This Post]](http://www.rantlust.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-print/images/print.gif)
Comments(9)

